Find Datasets from
UMB Researchers
of 1 Next >
Results Found: 2
  • Exploring perceived benefits and impacts of an entry-level PA doctoral degree
    UMB Dataset

    Alternate Title(s)
    Developing and evaluating an instrument to assess perceptions of an entry-level physician associate doctoral degree, A physician assistant entry-level doctoral degree: more harm than good?
    Authors
    Hyun-Jin Jun
    Karen L. Gordes
    Shani Fleming
    Violet Kulo
    2 more author(s)...
    Description

    This dataset is used to evaluate relationships between perceptions and perspectives on an entry-level Physician Associate/Assistant (PA) doctoral degree and the anticipated impact of it causing benefits or harm to the PA profession. The data benefits interprofessional stakeholders by providing standardized and tailored views of the PA profession. A cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews were used to collect data. The survey was distributed in June of 2020 to a national sample of 1368 PA clinicians and students and a total of 636 surveys were completed. The interviews recruited 38 participants and were conducted via Zoom or telephone in June and July of 2020.

    Subject
    Physician Assistants
    Physicians
    Geographic Coverage
    United States
    Timeframe
    2020
    Access Rights
    Unrestricted access
  • Impact evaluation of a brief online training module on physician use of the Maryland, USA, Prescription Drug Monitoring Program
    UMB Dataset

    Authors
    Oluwasanmi O. Adenaiye
    Julia B. Zirpoli
    Marissa Tan
    Brendan F. Day
    3 more author(s)...
    Description

    This study evaluated the effectiveness of a brief online educational intervention in increasing the use of Maryland Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMP). An email was sent to clinicians in Maryland who were licensed to prescribe controlled dangerous substances. The email contained a link to a project landing page where users had to register to complete a training module. The module included a baseline questionnaire, fictional cases of clinical situations to be made before and after receiving PDMP data, orientation to the Maryland PDMP, a post-training questionnaire, and the option to participate in a follow-up survey. Data from the training module was collected between June 2018 and March 2019. PDMP use data was collected from the Chesapeake Regional Information System for our Patients (CRISP) database. 178 participants who started the training module were eligible to be included in the study.

    Subject
    Practice Patterns, Physicians'
    Prescription Drug Misuse/prevention & control
    Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs
    Geographic Coverage
    Maryland
    Access Rights
    Unrestricted access